Patna High Court
MJC/631/2026 of Shiv Nandan Prajapati Vs The State of Bihar through Collector on 31 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.631 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5191 of 2015 ====================================================== Shiv Nandan Prajapati Son of Shakrati Prajapati, Resident of Village and Post Office and Police Station- Rohtas. ...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.631 of 2026
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5191 of 2015
======================================================
Shiv Nandan Prajapati Son of Shakrati Prajapati, Resident of Village and Post Office and Police Station- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Collector Rohtas at Sasaram Namely Udita Singh.
2.
The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Dehri, Rohtas Cum S.D.O Namely Nilesh Kumar.
3.
The Circle Officer, Nauhatta, Rohtas Namely Smt. Hinduja Bharti.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Standing Counsel 12
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
31-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: "for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite parties/contemnor who have willfully disobeyed the order dated 07.07.2025 passed by the Hon'ble Court in C.W.J.C. No. 5191 of 2015."
Patna High Court MJC No.631 of 2026(5) dt.31-07-2026
3. A show cause has come on behalf of the Circle Officer, Nauhatta, Rohtas, according to which the order passed by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms in Case No. 86M-11-12 dated 02.03.2012 stands set aside by the Divisional Commissioner, Patna in Land Dispute Appeal No.341 of 2013.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that only after the show cause has been filed that he got the knowledge that an order has been passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Patna. As such, liberty be granted to the petitioner to agitate the matter if grievance still remains.
5. In that background, nothing remains, granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the said order. The MJC No.631 of 2026 is disposed of and I.A. if any, also stands disposed of.
ankita/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U