Patna High Court
MJC/810/2026 of Yogendra Mahto Vs Shri Patya Amrit, the Chief Secretary, the State of Bihar on 31 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.810 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17276 of 2017 ====================================================== Yogendra Mahto S/o- Late Natthu Mahto, R/o Village- Araria Sangram, P.O.- Tulapatganj, P.S. and Anchal- Jhanjharpur.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.810 of 2026
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17276 of 2017
======================================================
Yogendra Mahto S/o- Late Natthu Mahto, R/o Village- Araria Sangram, P.O.- Tulapatganj, P.S. and Anchal- Jhanjharpur. District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
Shri Patya Amrit, the Chief Secretary, the State of Bihar Bihar.
2.
Shri Anand Sharma, The District Magistrate, Madhubani.
3.
Shri Vivek Kumar Mishra, The District Land Acquisition Officer, Madhubani.
4.
Shri Kumar Gaurav, The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, District- Madhubani.
5.
Shri Santosh Kumar Yadav, the Chairman National Highway Authority of India (NHAI), New Delhi.
6.
Shri Manoj Kumar Pandey, The Project Officer, National Highway Authority of India (NHAI), Darbhanga.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Government Pleader 18
For the State
:
Mr. Navnit Kumar, Advocate (AC to GP-10)
For the NHAI
:
Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate
:
Mr. Rajan Prakash, Advocate
:
Mrs. Pragya Kiran, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
31-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred: “for initiating contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for violating the order dated 17.06.2025 passed in CWJC No. 17276 of 2017 by the Hon'ble Court.”
Patna High Court MJC No.810 of 2026(4) dt.31-07-2026
3. A show cause of the opposite party on record which incorporate the order dated 23.06.2026 passed by the District Land Acquisition Officer, Madhubani in which the claim for payment as commercial category stands rejected and direction is given to make payment as per the residential category.
4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if still aggrieved.
5. Accordingly, the MJC No. 810 of 2026 stands disposed of.
sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U