Patna High Court
CR. MISC./29515/2026 of Jagarnath Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar on 31 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29515 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2025 Thana- DUMRA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Jagarnath Mukhiya S/o Baldeo Mukhiya R/o Village - Alhau Hari Chapra, P.S - Dumra, District -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29515 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2025 Thana- DUMRA District- Sitamarhi ======================================================
Jagarnath Mukhiya S/o Baldeo Mukhiya R/o Village - Alhau Hari Chapra, P.S
- Dumra, District - Sitamarhi
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Uday Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umeshanand Pandit
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
31-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 238, 61 and 3(5)of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 02.05.2025 and is a person with clean antecedent. It is submitted that petitioner had earlier moved this Court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.72077 of 2025 and the same came to be rejected by an order dated 26.02.2026 with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is next submitted that charges against the petitioner stands framed by an order dated 26.03.2026 (Annexure-3).
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29515 of 2026(2) dt.31-07-2026
4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Sessions Trial No.97 of 2026 arising out of Dumra P. S. Case No.218 of 2025.
6. The application stands allowed.
7. It is further made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial of the case in any manner the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T