Patna High Court
CR. MISC./53535/2026 of Bipin Kumar @ Bipin Yadav @ B. P. Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 31 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53535 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2021 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== Bipin Kumar @ Bipin Yadav @ B. P. Yadav S/o Ramprit Ray R/o Village - West Malahi Salempur, P.S. -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53535 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2021 Thana- BARH District- Patna ======================================================
Bipin Kumar @ Bipin Yadav @ B. P. Yadav S/o Ramprit Ray R/o Village - West Malahi Salempur, P.S. - Barh, District - Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Jay Ram Prasad
For the Opposite Party/s :
Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
31-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases under the Excise Act and is in custody since 21-5-2026 and allegation is of recovery of 270 litres of liquor along with 1000 litres of jawa mahua from a place near bank of Ganga river.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53535 of 2026(2) dt.31-07-2026
and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated at the instance of local people, but then it is submitted that if local people was aware about the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence, then why he did not inform the police prior to institution of the instant FIR, which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 113 of 2021.
Sumit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T