Patna High Court
MJC/1009/2026 of Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 31 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1009 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1050 of 2026 ====================================================== 1. Rahul Kumar Son of Sri Madan Yadav, resident of Ranipur Bahari, Pani Tanki, Patna City, District- Patna (Bihar),
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1009 of 2026
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1050 of 2026
======================================================
1.
Rahul Kumar Son of Sri Madan Yadav, resident of Ranipur Bahari, Pani Tanki, Patna City, District- Patna (Bihar), PIN- 800008.
2.
Madan Gope @ Madan Yadav Son of Late Raghunandan Yadav @
Raghunandan Gope, resident of Mohalla- Ranipur Khirki (near of South Pani Tanki), P.S. Mahendiganj, P.O.- Jhauganjj, Patna City, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
Thiyagarajan S.M., District Magistrate - cum-Collector, Patna.
3.
Smt. Amrita Anand, Circle Officer, Patna Sadar (Didarganj), Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ajay Prasad, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Standing Counsel 21
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
31-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred: “for initiating the contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for not complying the order dated 27.01.2026 passed by the Hon’ble Court in CWJC No.1050 of 2026.”
3. The show cause of the opposite party has come according to which the documents of the petitioners vis-a-vis Chandrashekhar Azad are found inculcating and as such no order can be passed.
4. This order has come on 15.06.2026 by Circle Patna High Court MJC No.1009 of 2026(3) dt.31-07-2026
Officer, Didarganj.
5. In that background, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the competent Court for the redressal of the grievance. No further direction can be given in the contempt petition.
6. Accordingly, MJC No. 1009 of 2026 is disposed of.
sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U