Patna High Court
MJC/1134/2026 of Rabindra Sharma Vs Sri K.K. Pathak on 31 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1134 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9600 of 2025 ====================================================== Rabindra Sharma Son of Late Raj Karan Sharma, Resident of Village- Daidih, P.O- Kure, P.S- Gharh, District-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1134 of 2026
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9600 of 2025
======================================================
Rabindra Sharma Son of Late Raj Karan Sharma, Resident of Village- Daidih, P.O- Kure, P.S- Gharh, District- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
Sri K.K. Pathak Son of not known to the petitioner, Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
Sri Dr. Safeena A.N., Son of not known to the petitioner, the Commissioner, Magadh Pramandal, District- Gaya.
3.
Sri Amu Amla, Son of not known to the petitioner, The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, District- Jehanabad.
4.
Sri Alankrita Pandey, Wife of not known to the petitioner, The Collector, Jehanabad.
5.
Sri Anil Kumar Sinha, Son of not known to the petitioner, The Additional Collector, District- Jehanabad.
6.
Sri Md. Shadab Alam, Son of not known to the petitioner, The Circle Officer, Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mrs. Ritika Rani, Advocate…
:
Mr. Dipu Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Government Pleader 4
For the State
:
Mr. Manoj Kumar, AC to GP-4
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
31-07-2026 Heard Mr. Dinu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the State.
2. The present petition has been preferred: for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnor/opposite parties for knowingly and deliberately violated the order dated 23.06.2025 passed by the Hon’ble Court in Patna High Court MJC No.1134 of 2026(4) dt.31-07-2026
CWJC No.9600 of 2025.”
3. Show cause has been come on behalf of the opposite party nos. 3 to 6 and after recording that the said land already stands transferred for Engineering College, a request has been made to the petitioner to take the offered land which is under the same Khata No. 193 inasmuch as he has been requested only to move from Khesara No. 2285 to Khesara No. 2283 and three acres of the said land has been allotted.
4. The petitioner has grievance and if he is not inclined to accept the said offer, the liberty is always there to challenge it by filing an appropriate petition.
5. Granting liberty, MJC No. 1134 of 2026 is disposed of.
Sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U