Patna High Court
MJC/668/2026 of Shiv Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar through the Additional Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms on 31 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.668 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12989 of 2025 ====================================================== Shiv Kumar Singh Son of Ramnagina Singh, Resident of Village- Tetua, Police Station- Atri, District- Gaya. ... ...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.668 of 2026
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12989 of 2025
======================================================
Shiv Kumar Singh Son of Ramnagina Singh, Resident of Village- Tetua, Police Station- Atri, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms Government of Bihar, Secretariat, Patna, Sri Dipak Kumar Singh.
2.
The Additional Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Secretariat, Patna, Sri Dipak Kumar Singh.
3.
The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya, Bihar, Sri A.N.
Sakeda.
4.
The District Magistrate-cum-District Collector, Gaya, Bihar, Sri Prashant Shubhankar.
5.
The Additional Collector, Gaya, Bihar, Sri Ashutosh Kumar.
6.
The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Nemchak Bathani, Gaya, Sri Keshav Anand.
7.
The Circle Officer, Atri Block, District- Gaya, Bihar, Sri Dilip Kumar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Government Advocate 7
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
31-07-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defect.
2. Heard the parties.
3. The present petition has been preferred: “for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for willful and deliberate violation of the order Patna High Court MJC No.668 of 2026(3) dt.31-07-2026
dated 18.08.2025 passed in CWJC No. 12989 of 2025 by the Hon’ble Court.”
4. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
5. Accordingly, the MJC No.668 of 2026 is dismissed as withdrawn.
vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U