Patna High Court
CR. MISC./49852/2026 of RAJENDRA MAHTO Vs The State of Bihar on 29 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49852 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2026 Thana- SRINAGAR District- West Champaran ====================================================== RAJENDRA MAHTO Son of Late Kamal Mahto Resident of Village- Kohara Musahari tola, P.S.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49852 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2026 Thana- SRINAGAR District- West Champaran ======================================================
RAJENDRA MAHTO Son of Late Kamal Mahto Resident of Village- Kohara Musahari tola, P.S.- Srinagar, District- West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Sarvesh Kashyap
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Umanath Mishra
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
29-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that that on 12-5-2026 at 9 pm, he was waiting near his JCB for his driver when accused persons, i.e., his agnates including the petitioner came and stated abusing, on objection Sanjay gave orders to kill, thereafter petitioner caught him from behind and Sant Kumar assaulted him by rod causing injury on head and Sanjay snatched his chain.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49852 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026
petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of dispute relating to property. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation of assaulting the informant by rod causing injury on head is against Sant Kumar and as far as the petitioner is concerned, the allegation against him is ornamental of holding the petitioner.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Srinagar P.S. Case No. 127 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.
Sumit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T