Patna High Court
CR. MISC./49839/2026 of Hariom Walia Vs The State of Bihar on 29 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49839 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2021 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== Hariom Walia Son of Ramveer Singh Walia House No.925, Street No.20, Block- A Sonia Vihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49839 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2021 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ======================================================
Hariom Walia Son of Ramveer Singh Walia House No.925, Street No.20, Block-A Sonia Vihar Part-4 Karawal Nagar, Police Station- Khajoori Khas, District- North East Delhi
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Shivesh Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Amitesh Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
29-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that an amount of Rs. 4,21,202/- was defalcated by the petitioner being Branch Manager of Reliance Digital Linebazar, Purnia.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that it is not a case of misappropriation or defalcation but is a case of accounting but Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49839 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026
in haste, the instant FIR came to be instituted with bald allegation that articles were sold but the money in lieu thereof was not deposited, it is also submitted that if the privilege of anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Khajanchi Hat ( Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
vikram/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T