Patna High Court
CR. MISC./47377/2026 of Hare Ram Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar on 29 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47377 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2020 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani ====================================================== Hare Ram Mukhiya Son of Rajendra Mukhiya Resident of Village- Mahindwar Navtoli, P.S.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47377 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2020 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani ======================================================
Hare Ram Mukhiya Son of Rajendra Mukhiya Resident of Village- Mahindwar Navtoli, P.S.- Phulparas, District- Madhubani
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
29-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Phulparas P. S. Case No. 95 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 386, 120(B), 506, 353 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. It is alleged that on 06.03.2020 at about 7:30 PM, 5-6 persons, armed with sharp-cutting weapons such as katta, iron rod, lathi surrounded informant and assaulted on his head by means of katta as a result of which, he sustained injury. It is further alleged that the accused persons assaulted him by means of iron rod and lathi and snatched his wrist watch and Rs. 2,500/- cash from his pocket.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47377 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026
is not named in the F.I.R. and his name transpired during course of investigation. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that during investigation, number of witnesses stated the name of this petitioner, establishing involvement of petitioner in the said occurrence. He further submits that instant F.I.R. has been instituted in the year 2020 but petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of anticipatory bail after lapse of six years without any plausible explanation.
6. Considering the nature of accusation and delay in filing the anticipatory bail application, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused.
Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T