Patna High Court
CR. MISC./47637/2026 of Deepu Kumar @ Dipu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 29 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47637 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada ====================================================== Deepu Kumar @ Dipu Kumar S/o Tulsi Mahto Resident of Village- Mahiyan, P.S.- Mohanpur, District-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47637 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada ======================================================
Deepu Kumar @ Dipu Kumar S/o Tulsi Mahto Resident of Village- Mahiyan, P.S.- Mohanpur, District- Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
Reena Kumari D/o Late Rajendra Prasad R/o vill - Baniyan Bigha, P.S.- Narhat, Distt.- Nawada
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Yogendra Kumar, A.P.P.
For the O.P. No. 2
:
Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Mr. Sudhir Kumar,
Mr. Anil Kumar, Mr. Aditya Pushkar, Advocates ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
29-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, opposite party no. 2 and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Narhat P. S. Case No. 122 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. It is alleged that on false promise of marriage, this petitioner committed rape upon the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and there was no relationship between petitioner and the informant. Petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47637 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026
claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that there is allegation against this petitioner to commit rape with informant on promise of marriage and thereafter, refused to marry on the ground of dowry.
6. Considering the nature and seriousness of accusation, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused.
Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T