Patna High Court
CR. MISC./52600/2026 of Raj Kumar @ Baliya Vs The State of Bihar on 29 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52600 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2026 Thana- Baijnathpur District- Saharsa ====================================================== Raj Kumar @ Baliya son of Late Bechan yadav Resident of village- Rampur, ward no 3, PS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52600 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2026 Thana- Baijnathpur District- Saharsa ======================================================
Raj Kumar @ Baliya son of Late Bechan yadav Resident of village- Rampur, ward no 3, PS -Baijnathpur, District- Saharsa
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Ms. Rashmi Jha, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
29-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Baijnathpur P.s. Case No.36 of 2026, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 41 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 8.4 litres of codeine cough syrup from a motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized vehicle and he came to be implicated based on confessional statement of Guddu and Mithilesh in police Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52600 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026
custody which does not have any evidentiary value.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that allegation is of recovery of codeine cough syrup. It is further submitted that of late in the State of Bihar children of impressionable age are using codeine for the purposes of intoxication and syrup has created havoc and investigation in the case is continuing.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected.
amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T