Patna High Court

CR. MISC./51118/2026 of Saif @ Md. Saif Vs The State of Bihar on 29 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51118 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2026 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1. Saif @ Md. Saif S/o Hidakat Hussain Resident of Village - Nawadih, P.S. -Auranagabad

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51118 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2026 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN District- Aurangabad

======================================================

1.

Saif @ Md. Saif S/o Hidakat Hussain Resident of Village - Nawadih, P.S.

-Auranagabad Town, District - Aurangabad.

2.

Md. Alisan S/o Md. Kalim Resident of Village - Nawadih, P.S.

-Auranagabad Town, District - Aurangabad.

3.

Md. Ejajul @ Md. Azaz S/o Md. Kalim Resident of Village - Nawadih, P.S.

-Auranagabad Town, District - Aurangabad.

4.

Bhola @ Hasan Jalal S/o Fajilat Hassain Resident of Village - Nawadih, P.S.

-Auranagabad Town, District - Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. M. K. Nirala, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

29-07-2026 Heard Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. M. K. Nirala, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Aurangabad (Town) P.S. Case No. 89 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1) of the BNS.

3. Allegedly on the given date and time of occurrence when the informant came to know that her brother-in-law is shot dead and thus while she was going to shop, in the meanwhile, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51118 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026

she saw that her neighbours were engaged in celebrating the death of her brother-in-law and when she made a protest, all of them assaulted by means of iron rod due to which she sustained grievous injury.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioners referring to the FIR contended that bare plain reading of the same, it is evident that omnibus accusation has been levelled against nine accused persons, including the petitioners, without giving any specific averments as to by whom she has sustained injury. Moreover, the informant has sustained only one injury. The reason behind the said occurrence is said to be an earlier case bearing Aurangabad (Town) P.S. Case No. 205 of 2021 instituted by the mother of the petitioner no. 4 against the family members of the informant. The petitioners do have some criminal antecedent, however, they undertake that they will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the court.

5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the informant has sustained grievous injury.

6. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocates for the respective parties and taking note of the omnibus nature of accusation, coupled with the genesis of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51118 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026

the occurrence, besides the undertaking of the petitioners, let the petitioners abovenamed be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad (Town) P.S. Case No. 89 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioners.

Anjani/- (Harish Kumar, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead