Patna High Court
CR. MISC./52155/2026 of Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Ray Vs The State of Bihar on 29 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52155 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Samastipur ====================================================== Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Ray Son of Manoj Kumar Rai @ Manoj Kumar Ray R/o Village-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52155 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Samastipur ======================================================
Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Ray Son of Manoj Kumar Rai @ Manoj Kumar Ray R/o Village- Nauachak, P.S.- Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Anish Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
29-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of 12 cases under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 828 litres of liquor from a pick up vehicle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52155 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026
his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated. It is also submitted that the petitioner was completely unaware that his friend would misuse his vehicle in the manner as alleged who also fled from the spot. It is also submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise, the police starts implicating mechanically either through chowkidar, local person, confessional statement or secret information without holding a proper investigation.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.60,000/- (Rupees Sixty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sadar Excise P.S. Case No.107/2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
7. It is made clear that the learned trial court thereafter Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52155 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026
shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than 12 cases, in that event, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if on verification it is found that petitioner has antecedent of 12 cases, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T