Patna High Court
CR. MISC./50170/2026 of Sohan Ram Vs The State of Bihar on 29 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50170 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2026 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1. Sohan Ram S/o Vindeshwari Ram R/o Village - Neerpur, PS - Suryagarha, District -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50170 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2026 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
1.
Sohan Ram S/o Vindeshwari Ram R/o Village - Neerpur, PS - Suryagarha, District - Lakhisarai
2.
Nitin Kumar S/o Sanjay Ram R/o Village - Neerpur, PS - Suryagarha, District - Lakhisarai
3.
Manoj Ram S/o Kamo Ram R/o Village - Neerpur, PS - Suryagarha, District
- Lakhisarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Md Irshad, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
29-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 63 of 2026 dated 05.03.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section s 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners were part of an unlawful assembly, while the co-accused Dharo Ram @ Dharmendra Ram assaulted by means of iron rod upon the informant, which hit on his hand after he tried to protect the said Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50170 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026
assault by his hand. It has further been alleged that, thereafter, all the accused persons started assaulting mercilessly while co- accused Deepak Kumar, who was assaulted by all the accused persons. It has further been alleged that the co-accused Dharo Ram @ Dharmendra Ram took gold locket from the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners, while there is case and counter case between the parties. It has further been submitted that the specific allegation of assault is against co- accused Dharo Ram @ Dharmendra Ram. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50170 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026
like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 63 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
8. The application stands allowed.
shivam/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T