Patna High Court
CR. MISC./49103/2026 of Ilyas Hussain Vs The State of Bihar on 29 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49103 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2025 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Ilyas Hussain S/o Kadir Hussain Resident of Mohalla Ward No. 11, Mafi Gali, Warisaliganj, P.S.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49103 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2025 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ======================================================
Ilyas Hussain S/o Kadir Hussain Resident of Mohalla Ward No. 11, Mafi Gali, Warisaliganj, P.S. - Warisaliganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Rajesh Ranjan Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Renuka Ratnakar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
29-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 135 of 2025 for the offence under sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution story, the Police intercepted a motorcycle and there is recovery/seizure of 2 liter Beer. This led to the FIR.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is the owner of the motorcycle and as such, got implicated. The further submission is that the petitioner do not have criminal antecedent.
5. Further, learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the judgment of the Full Bench of Hon’ble Patna High Court in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49103 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026
case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) PLJR 1089 wherein it has been held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76(2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.
6. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that he is the owner of the motorcycle.
7. Taking into account the submissions of the parties and the judgment in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra), as also that he do not have criminal antecedent, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail with conditions.
8. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Court of Excise II, Nawada in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 135 of 2025 subject to the following conditions:
(i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide; Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49103 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026
(ii) the petitioner(s) shall be appearing before the Police Station as and when required for co-operating in the investigation;
(iii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iv) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every month for six months to mark his attendance and after the end of the period, the certificate shall be submitted before the Trial Court failing which steps shall be taken for the cancellation of the bail bonds;
(v) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(vi) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.
Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U