Patna High Court
CWJC/6228/2025 of Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar on 27 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6228 of 2025 ====================================================== 1. Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar Singh Son of Late Maheshwar Singh, Resident of village- Bahuara Baj, P.O.- Fulkaha, P.S. - Shyampur, Bhatha, and District Sheohar. 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6228 of 2025
======================================================
1.
Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar Singh Son of Late Maheshwar Singh, Resident of village- Bahuara Baj, P.O.- Fulkaha, P.S. - Shyampur, Bhatha, and District Sheohar.
2.
Pawan Kumar Singh, Son of Late Maheshwar Singh, Resident of village- Bahuara Baj, P.O.- Fulkaha, P.S. - Shyampur, Bhatha, and District Sheohar.
3.
Chunnu Kumar Singh, Son of Late Maheshwar Singh, Resident of village- Bahuara Baj, P.O.- Fulkaha, P.S. - Shyampur, Bhatha, and District Sheohar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Collector, Sheohar.
3.
The Additional Collector, Sheohar.
4.
The Deputy Collector Land Reform, Sheohar.
5.
The District Land Settlement Officer, Sheohar.
6.
The District Fisheries Officer, Sheohar.
7.
The Circle Officer, Dumari Katsari, District- Sheohar.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
None
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
27-07-2026 Heard Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioners. There is no representation on behalf of the State.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the Respondent authorities to issue Patna High Court CWJC No.6228 of 2025(4) dt.27-07-2026
rent receipt creating new Jamabandi in the name of the petitioners with respect to the land in question.
(ii) For further direction to the Respondent authorities not to settle the pond to any one as the land in question is raiyati land, rent has been paid to the State of Bihar till 1969 and still is in possession of the petitioners.
(iii) For further direction to the Respondent authorities to delete the land in question from the Sairat Register.
(iv) For further direction to the Respondent authorities to dispose of the representation of the petitioners by reasoned and speaking order within time framed.
(v) For any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioners are found to be entitled in the eye of law.”
3. A counter-affidavit has come on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 to 4 and 7 and paragraph-37 shows that the Collector, Sheohar has already taken note of the representation of the petitioner and has registered Misc. Case No. 01 of 2026- 27 which is presently pending for adjudication.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6228 of 2025(4) dt.27-07-2026
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it will suffice if the same is taken to its logical conclusion but a time frame be recorded failing which it will take a longer period.
5. In that background, the writ petition stands disposed of allowing the Collector, Sheohar to dispose of the Misc. Case No. 01 of 2026-27, after hearing all the parties, in accordance with law, preferably by 31st of December, 2026.
6. Before passing an order, the Collector, Sheohar is directed to constitute an enquiry team, seek report and only thereafter, after hearing the parties, take a decision.
Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U