Patna High Court
CWJC/10698/2026 of Manoj Kumar Suresh Chaudhary @ Manoj Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar on 24 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10698 of 2026 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar Suresh Chaudhary @ Manoj Kumar Chaudhary son of Suresh Choudhary, Resident of village-Pokhram, P.S-Biraul, District-Darbhanga, presently residing at
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10698 of 2026
======================================================
Manoj Kumar Suresh Chaudhary @ Manoj Kumar Chaudhary son of Suresh Choudhary, Resident of village-Pokhram, P.S-Biraul, District-Darbhanga, presently residing at Mohalla- E- 104, Rashmi Residency, New Link Road, above OBC Bank, Varsi, Nailospar, East, P.S and District- Thane (Maharashtra)- 401209. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Land Reform and Revenue Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Secretary, Land Reform and Revenue Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga.
4.
The District Magistrate- cum- Collector, Darbhanga.
5.
The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Biraul, District- Darbhanga.
6.
The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Biraul, District-Darbhanga.
7.
The Circle Officer, Biraul, District- Darbhanga.
8.
Sri Babu Saheb Chaudhary, son of late Bhuttu Chaudhary, Resident of village-Pokhram, P.S-Biraul, District-Darbhanga.
9.
Triveni Yadav, son of late Khushi Yadav, Resident of village-Pokhram, P.S- Biraul, District-Darbhanga.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Pankaj Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr.Sanjay Kumar, AC to GP-23
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
24-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
(i) for issuance of an appropriate writ/s, order/s, order/s, direction/s, to the respondent no.7 (Circle Officer, Biraul) for measurement of land and demarcation of boundary under Block Biraul, Mauza- Pokhram, Thana no. 287, Khata no. 786
Patna High Court CWJC No.10698 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026
(old), Khata no.1244 (New), Khesra no.2806 (old), 2807(old), Khata no. 2811, Khesra No. 5621 (new) admeasuring about 5.9 decimal which is raiyati land and was possession of the father of the petitioner upon which he has been living peacefully for a long period;
(ii) for issuance of an appropriate writ/s, order/s, order/s, direction/s to the restrain the private respondent who were interfering in peaceful possession of the land on the ground that the said land was obtained from his vendee, intact that vendee of the father of the petitioner namely Chalitra Mukhiya as well as Jiwachch Mukhiya has sold the land by registered deed in the name of father of the petitioner through different deed situated under Block Biraul, Mauza-Pokhram, Thana no. 287. Khatana (old), Khata no. 1244 (New), Khesra no.2806 (old), 2807(old), Khata no. 2811, Khesra No. 5621 (new) admeasuring about 5.9 decimal;
(iii) for issuance of an appropriate writ/s, Patna High Court CWJC No.10698 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026
order/s, order/s, direction/s to the respondent no.7 after measurement of the land of the petitioner in presence of respondent no.8 and 9, handed over the possession of the said land after demarcation so that quietus may be given to the disputes arose between the petitioner and the respondent no. 8;
(iv) to pass such other order/orders as your Lordships my deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. Let the petitioner prefers a fresh petition before the Circle Officer, Biraul, Darbhanga (respondent no.07) who shall be taking appropriate steps, noticing the parties and see to it that the prayer put forward by the petitioner is taken to its logical conclusion, if a fresh petition alongwith the requisite fee is submitted in next four weeks.
4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U