Patna High Court
CWJC/11045/2026 of Md. Rustam Ali Vs The State of Bihar on 24 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11045 of 2026 ====================================================== Md. Rustam Ali S/o- Md. Eanu, R/o-Vill.-Deogaon, Bharri, P.S.- Kadwa, Dist. Katihar, Bihar 855105. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11045 of 2026
======================================================
Md. Rustam Ali S/o- Md. Eanu, R/o-Vill.-Deogaon, Bharri, P.S.- Kadwa, Dist. Katihar, Bihar 855105.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5.
Deputy Director, Panchayati Raj, Purnea Division, Purnea.
6.
The District Magistrate, Katihar.
7.
The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Katihar.
8.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Katihar.
9.
The Block Development Officer, Kadwa, Katihar.
10.
The Block Panchayati Raj Officer, Kadwa, Katihar.
11.
The Circle Officer, Kadwa, Katihar.
12.
The Primary School, Devgaon, Gram-Panchayat- Bharri, P.S. and Block- Kadwa, district- Katihar, through Headmaster.
13.
The Panchayat Secretary, Bharri Gram-Panchayat, PO-Bharri, PS and Block- Kadwa, District- Katihar.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Mohammad Akhter Hussain, Adv.
Mr. Umesh Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Shubhankar Raj, Adv.
Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Amartya Raj, Adv.
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Government Pleader (5)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
24-07-2026 Heard Mr. Umesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):
Patna High Court CWJC No.11045 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026
i) for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ for quashing the District Magistrate order; Vividh Vaad No.- 51/2026-27; order dated- 12/05/2026, which is arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice, inasmuch as the concerned authority failed to consider the documents and materials duly submitted by the petitioner before passing the said order.
ii) For issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other respondent authorities to demolish the construction of the Government Primary School, Devgaon which has been constructed in the land of petitioner; pertaining to Khata no.-92, Khesra no.-554; Rakba- 34 Dec.; Thana no.- 272; Mauja-Devgaon; without his permission and consent.
iii) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ for commanding the respondent authorities to call for the administrative order passed by the concerned
authority
whereby
the administrative order has been passed for construction of the Government Primary School, Devgaon and further be pleased to issue of the writ in the nature of Certiorari to Patna High Court CWJC No.11045 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026
quash the same.
iv) For issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ for commanding the respondent authorities to take action including the criminal against the respondent authorities who have ordered to construct the case building of the Primary Govt. School upon the aforesaid land of the petitioner.
v) For issuance of any other appropriate writ, order(s) or direction(s) which your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be granted liberty to approach the Competent Civil Court for the redressal of the grievance.
4. Learned State Counsel has no objection.
5. In that background, granting liberty to approach the Competent Civil Court and with an observation that if any petition is filed, it will be taken to its logical conclusion without unnecessary adjournment, the writ petition is disposed of.
Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U