Patna High Court
CWJC/10891/2026 of Jitendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar on 24 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10891 of 2026 ====================================================== Jitendra Singh Son of Ramagya Singh, Resident of village Kopa, Police Station Kopa, Anchal Kopa, District Saran at Chapra, presently residing at near East Railway
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10891 of 2026
======================================================
Jitendra Singh Son of Ramagya Singh, Resident of village Kopa, Police Station Kopa, Anchal Kopa, District Saran at Chapra, presently residing at near East Railway Cabin Mogra Purba Sekh Para, Alikhola Mogra, Hooghly, West Bengal - 712148.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, District Saran at Chapra.
2.
The District Magistrate, District Saran at Chapra.
3.
The Additional Collector Saran, District Saran at Chapra.
4.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, District Saran at Chapra.
5.
The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Chapra Sadar, District Saran at Chapra.
6.
The Circle Officer, Jalalpur, District Saran at Chapra.
7.
Sanjeev Kumar, Son of late Madan Mohan Prasad, Resident of village Majhanpura, Police Station Manjhi, District Saran at Chapra.
8.
Bhairva Prasad, Son of late Surendra Singh, Resident of village Kopa, Police Station Kopa, Anchal Kopa, District Saran at Chapra.
9.
Harendra Singh, Son of Chandrika Singh, Resident of village Kopa, Police Station Kopa, Anchal Kopa, District Saran at Chapra.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ravindra Nath Dubey, Adv.
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Government Pleader (26)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
24-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “for issuance of writ/writs, order/orders, to direction/directions to the respondents examine the records of the land of Mouza Kopa, Thana No.
431. Khata No. 03, Plot Nos. 2002, 2009
Patna High Court CWJC No.10891 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026
containing area 18 Katha of which the Petitioner and others are in possession since more that 70 years and Respondent No. 7 in connivance with 8 and 9 who are land Respondent Nos. Mafia tried to grab the land and he gave frivolous application before the Circle Officer, Jalalpur, District Saran at Chapra for measurement of the land and the Circle Officer in connivance of the land Mafia i.e. Respondent Nos. 8, 9 without examining the report of his subordinates, arbitrarily issued notice dated 15.05.2026 vide Memo No. 1097 only for the purpose of grabbing the land of the Petitioner and further direct the respondents not to disturb the possession of the Petitioner over the said land and for any other relief/reliefs to which the petitioner is found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case for the ends of justice.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some argument, submits that he is ready to get his revenue records examined by the Circle Officer, Jalalpur, Saran at Chapra so that the actual facts of the land in question (incorporated in paragraph 1 of the prayer) comes to light.
Patna High Court CWJC No.10891 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026
4. Learned State counsel submits that if the petitioner cooperates in the matter both records shall be taken into account and the field inspection/measurement shall also be undertaken so that the petitioner’s bona fide prayer is/are accepted.
5. This Court expects the petitioner to file a fresh petition before the Circle Officer, Jalalpur, Saran at Chapra in next four weeks who shall be hearing him as also the other stakeholders and see to it that the matter is taken to its logical conclusion at an earliest.
6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petitioner is disposed of.
munindra/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U