Patna High Court
CR. MISC./18050/2026 of Deepak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 24 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18050 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2025 Thana- SONO District- Jamui ====================================================== Deepak Kumar Son of Sri Nagarjeet Ram R/o Village - Banpura, P.S. - Rasulpur, Dist. - Saran. ... ...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18050 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2025 Thana- SONO District- Jamui ======================================================
Deepak Kumar Son of Sri Nagarjeet Ram R/o Village - Banpura, P.S. - Rasulpur, Dist. - Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
24-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the BNS.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and in sum and substance, the allegation against the petitioner in the FIR is that he was appointed on the post of GNM based on a letter which subseqeuntly was found forged. It is further submitted that petitioner has been removed from the service.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that prior to instituting the FIR, no explanation from the petitioner was sought. It is next Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18050 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026
submitted that had an opportunity been given to the petitioner to explain his side of the case perhaps the instant FIR would not have been instituted.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 44 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
Kundan/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T