Patna High Court
MJC/9/2026 of Rambha Devi Vs The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, General and Administrative Reforms Department on 24 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.9 of 2026 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.884 of 2024 ====================================================== Rambha Devi Wife of Late Veerbahadur Singh Resident of Village- Rana Bigha, P.S.- Barh, District- Patna. ... ...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.9 of 2026
In
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.884 of 2024
======================================================
Rambha Devi Wife of Late Veerbahadur Singh Resident of Village- Rana Bigha, P.S.- Barh, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, General and Administrative Reforms Department Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
Sri B. Rajendra, the Principal Secretary, General and Administrative Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Sri Shirsat Kapil Ashok, the District Magistrate, Patna.
4.
Subham Kumar, the Sub- Divisional Officer, Barh, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Kumar Manglam, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Government Pleader 4
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
24-07-2026 The present petition has been filed for restoring a petition bearing MJC No. 884 of 2024, which has stood dismissed on account of non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 16.05.2025.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of the laxity of the Advocate clerk, the defects, as pointed by the registry, could not be removed within time, hence a sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid petition be restored to its original file.
3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the averments made in the present petition, I
Patna High Court MJC No.9 of 2026(3) dt.24-07-2026
deem it fit and proper to restore the aforesaid petition bearing MJC No. 884 of 2024 to its original file, however subject to removal of the defects within a period of two weeks from today.
4. Accordingly,
the
present
petition
stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.
Ajay/- (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) U