Patna High Court
CWJC/10869/2026 of Ram Briksh Das @ Ram Briksh Mochi Vs The State of Bihar on 24 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10869 of 2026 ====================================================== Ram Briksh Das @ Ram Briksh Mochi S/o late Muril Mochi, Resident of Village- Panti, Post Office- Bahsa Pipra, Police Station- Fatehpur, Circle Office- Tankuppa,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10869 of 2026
======================================================
Ram Briksh Das @ Ram Briksh Mochi S/o late Muril Mochi, Resident of Village- Panti, Post Office- Bahsa Pipra, Police Station- Fatehpur, Circle Office- Tankuppa, District- Gaya Ji.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the chief secretary, Govt of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of land Reforms/Revenue, Govt of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Secretary, Department of land Reforms/Revenue Govt of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya Ji.
5.
The District collector/District Magistrate, Gaya Ji.
6.
The Director General of Police, Govt of Bihar, Patna.
7.
The Inspector General of Police, Magadh Division, Gaya Ji.
8.
The Senior Suprentendent of Police, Gaya Ji.
9.
The Subdivisional officer Sadar, Gaya Ji.
10.
The Circle Officer, Circle Office, Tankuppa, District Gaya Ji.
11.
The S.H.O Tankuppa, police station Tankuppa, Distt. Gaya Ji.
12.
The S.H.O Fatehpur, police station Fatehpur, District- Gaya Ji.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Virendra Prasad, Adv.
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Uday Shankar Sharan Singh, GP-19
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
24-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):
(i) for that the petitioner filed a writ petition for seeking of the directions respondents authorities to correct the name in Revisional Survey (RS) and issued parwana in the name of the petitioner by Patna High Court CWJC No.10869 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026
which that the deceased father have acquired 1 Acr and 58 decimals land bearing CS plot no 208, CS khata no 71 thana no 432 out of 2 Acr, 53 decimals by which said land settled by the than landlord Maharaj Gopal Sharan Narayan Saheb Tekari Raj, accordingly HukumNama granted in favour of father of the petitioner's father by the manager of Tekari Raj, dt 17.Ashadh, 1344 fasli i.e in the year 1937 ,said land have still in position of the petitioner, But in revisional survey RS khata no 105, RS plot no 320 areas 1 Acr 60 decimals land wrongly recorded entered the name of Anabad Sarv Sadharan place of the petitioner.
(ii) . For seeking directions of the respondents authorities to issue parwana in favour name of the petitioner by which that the said land is still in position of the petitioner from land given by the Tekari Raj to till date.
(iii) For that any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled may be granted by this Hon'ble.
3. In the presence of Mr. Uday Shankar Sharan Singh, learned State Counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Virendra Prasad submits that the petitioner be allowed to approach the appropriate authority/Competent Civil Court for Patna High Court CWJC No.10869 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026
the redressal of the grievance.
4. Granting said liberty and without commenting on the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of.
Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U