Patna High Court
CR. MISC./78601/2025 of Dharm Alok Vs The State of Bihar on 24 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78601 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2024 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE - ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== Dharm Alok S/O Late Jay Kumar Sah Resident of Village and Post Singhia Buzurg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78601 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2024 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE - ROSERA
District- Samastipur
======================================================
Dharm Alok S/O Late Jay Kumar Sah Resident of Village and Post Singhia Buzurg Uttar, Ward No. 07, P.S.- Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Patna
2.
Prince Kumar S/O Vijay Kumar Mahto Resident of Ward No. 06, Singhia Buzurg Uttar, P.S.- Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur.- 848236
3.
Priyam Kumar S/O Vijay Kumar Mahto Resident of Ward No. 06, Singhia Buzurg Uttar, P.S.- Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur.- 848236
4.
Chameli Devi @ Chameli Kumari W/O Vijay Kumar Mahto Resident of Ward No. 06, Singhia Buzurg Uttar, P.S.- Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur.- 848236
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Umesh Prasad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
2 24-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing vehemently for sometime realizing his difficulty seeks permission to withdraw the cancellation application.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly,
the
present
cancellation application is dismissed as withdrawn.
rajesh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T