Patna High Court
CWJC/10929/2026 of Ramesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 24 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10929 of 2026 ====================================================== Ramesh Yadav Son of Ramrprit Yadav, Resident of Village Siswa Barhi, PS and Circle Phulparas, District Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10929 of 2026
======================================================
Ramesh Yadav Son of Ramrprit Yadav, Resident of Village Siswa Barhi, PS
and Circle Phulparas, District Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Commissioner, Darbhanga.
3.
The District Magistrate, Madhubani.
4.
The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Phulparas, District Madhubani.
5.
The Circle Officer, Phulparas Circle, District Madhubani.
6.
The Anchal Amin Phulparas Circle, District Madhubani.
7.
Ajit Kumar Yadav, S/o shri Shivnath Yadav, Resident of Village Siswa Barhi, PS and Circle Phulparas, District Madhubani.
8.
The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Phulparas, Madhubani
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Government Pleader (18)
:
Mr. Vivekanand Singh, AC to GP 18
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
24-07-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed to implead the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Phulparas, Madhubani as respondent no. 8 in course of the day.
2. Heard the parties.
3. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
(i) for issuance of an appropriate writ directing the Respondent for removal of encroachment from done by the Respondent no. 7 for the excess land appertaining to Patna High Court CWJC No.10929 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026
khata no. 365 khehra old 2133 kheshra new 2729 under mauja Siswa Barhi Thana No 106 P.S. and Circle-Phulparas District- Madhubani as he has acquired only 5 Katha 8 dhur through a registered sale deed on 29.7.1991 from the said plot while he has illegally took possession over 10 katha 12 dhur and 8 kanma and thus he has encroached more 5 katha 4 dhur 8 kanma of land which belongs to S.H. 51 and Hind Keshar.
(ii) for direction upon the respondents to take immediate step towards removal of encroachment.
(iii) for any other relief(s) order(s) to which the petitioner may be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.
4. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a proper petition shall be filed before the respondent no. 8, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Phulparas, Madhubani in next four weeks.
5. Learned State counsel submits that if such petition is preferred, it will be taken to its logical conclusion at an earliest in accordance with law.
6. In that background, the writ petition is disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 8, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Phulparas, Madhubani who shall be Patna High Court CWJC No.10929 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026
noticing the stakeholders including the respondent no. 7 and see to it that within the time frame stipulated under the act, the petition preferred by the petitioner shall be concluded.
sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U