Patna High Court
CR. MISC./33896/2026 of Mithun Kumar @ Mithu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 24 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33896 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-331 Year-2022 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Mithun Kumar @ Mithu Kumar S/o Raghunath Das Resident of village - Banjhula, P.S -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33896 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-331 Year-2022 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ======================================================
Mithun Kumar @ Mithu Kumar S/o Raghunath Das Resident of village - Banjhula, P.S - Chakiya, District - East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
24-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 331 of 2022 for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the allegation, the informant was waylaid by three persons and altogether Rs. 44820/- was robbed which the informant had collected from a group of women, being a field officer of a finance company.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and his name transpired on the basis of confessional statement made by co-accused Rohit Kumar and except that there is no other material against Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33896 of 2026(3) dt.24-07-2026
the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Heard the parties and perused the record.
7. From the record it appears that process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. has already been issued against the petitioner in this case of robbery, wherein his name has transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused.
8. Considering the nature of the allegations and the necessity of his custodial interrogation, the prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby dismissed.
Abdus/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T