Patna High Court

CR. MISC./38481/2026 of Malo Devi @ Mano Devi Vs The State of Bihar on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38481 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2026 Thana- KARJAIN District- Supaul ====================================================== Malo Devi @ Mano Devi S/o Visheshwar Sharma @ Bisheshwar Sharma @ Bishnu Sharma Resident of village

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38481 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2026 Thana- KARJAIN District- Supaul ======================================================

Malo Devi @ Mano Devi S/o Visheshwar Sharma @ Bisheshwar Sharma @

Bishnu Sharma Resident of village - Dumari, Ward No. 02, Police Station - Karjain, District - Supaul

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Arun, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

23-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Karjain P.S. Case No. 29 of 2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. As per the allegation, from the house of the co- accused Vishnu Sharma, altogether 1.8088 Kg. of Ganja was recovered while this petitioner being wife of co-accused Vishnu Sharma, managed to flee away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a lady and she has herself been made victim of circumstances and the petitioner, being wife of co-accused Vishnu Sharma, was not aware of the fact that her husband has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38481 of 2026(3) dt.23-07-2026

kept Ganja in the house. It has further been submitted that the house is jointly possessed by many persons and petitioner may not be held liable. It has further been submitted that the police has developed a story of petitioner having fled away from the place of occurrence in order to make the petitioner an accused. It has further been submitted that the procedures prescribed under Section 103 B.N.S.S. has not been followed with. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Heard the parties and perused the record. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. The same is accordingly dismissed.

Abdus/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead