Patna High Court
CR. MISC./44482/2026 of Bablu Kuraishi Vs The State of Bihar on 23 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44482 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2026 Thana- JANTA BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Bablu Kuraishi S/o Mustafa Kuraishi R/o - Tajpur Chatiya, P.S - JantaBazar, District -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44482 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2026 Thana- JANTA BAZAR District- Saran
======================================================
1.
Bablu Kuraishi S/o Mustafa Kuraishi R/o - Tajpur Chatiya, P.S - JantaBazar, District - Saran.
2.
Nafish Kuraishi @ Nafish S/o Mustafa R/o - Tajpur Chatiya, P.S - JantaBazar, District - Saran.
3.
Shazad Kuraishi S/o Bablu Kuraishi R/o - Tajpur Chatiya, P.S - JantaBazar, District - Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Jha
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
2 23-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that her husband on 07.04.2026 was sleeping outside the house when 11 named accused persons including the petitioners came and assaulted her husband and Sahjad, further reason for the occurrence was that her daughter married Arif about a month back but Arif’s family members were not happy thus had offered Rs. 2
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44482 of 2026(2) dt.23-07-2026 2/2 lakhs and had requested to take the girl back, on refusal the occurrence was committed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case being related to Arif, it is further submitted that allegation of assault is not specific and the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature as would manifest from Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Janta Bazar P.S. Case No. 100 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
vikram/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T