Patna High Court
CR. MISC./32841/2026 of Hariom Pandey Vs The State of Bihar on 23 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32841 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2025 Thana- Dhrampura District- Rohtas ====================================================== Hariom Pandey (Male), aged about 19 years, S/O Jaikant Pandey, Resident of Village - Tilain,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32841 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2025 Thana- Dhrampura District- Rohtas ======================================================
Hariom Pandey (Male), aged about 19 years, S/O Jaikant Pandey, Resident of Village - Tilain, P.S- Dharampura, Dist.- Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Krishna Tiwary, Advocate
Mr. Vijay Krishna Tiwary, Advocate
Mr. Lalitesh Mani, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madhuri Lata, APP
For the Informant
:
Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND
MALVIYA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
23-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Informant, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.
2. The petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, it is a case of murder of husband of the informant by some unknown persons.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of suspicion. He next submits that all the witnesses are hearsay witnesses with regard to the alleged occurrence and no Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32841 of 2026(3) dt.23-07-2026
evidence has been found against this petitioner. He next submits that the petitioner and his father would have murdered to her husband because they were seen running away from the place but the informant is not saying that the petitioner and his son have holding any arms and ammunition or weapons. Petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para-3 of the petition and he in custody since 16.12.2025.
5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the Informant opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. In the light of the aforesaid submissions as made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Sasaram (Rohtas) in Dharampura P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025.
Brajesh Kumar/- (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U T