Patna High Court

CWJC/11187/2024 of Gulab Memorial Inter College Vs The State of Bihar on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11187 of 2024 ====================================================== Gulab Memorial Inter College Bettiah West Champaran through its Principal Karim Khan aged about 55 years (Male), Son of Late Razak Khan, Ghar Sathi Birdi Tola, P.O.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11187 of 2024

======================================================

Gulab Memorial Inter College Bettiah West Champaran through its Principal Karim Khan aged about 55 years (Male), Son of Late Razak Khan, Ghar Sathi Birdi Tola, P.O. and P.S.- Sathi, District Champaran at Bettiah.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director Secondary Education, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran.

3.

The Director, Secondar Education, Patna.

4.

The District Education Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran.

5.

Bihar School Examination Board, Buddha Marg, Patna through its Secretary.

6.

The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Buddha Marg, Patna.

7.

The Director (Academic), Bihar School Examination Board, Buddha Marg, Patna.

8.

Mustaqueen Ansari, Son of late Mustafa Ansari, Resident of Santghat, ward no. 14, P.O. and P.S. Bettiah, District-West Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr. Prashant Sinha, Adv.

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

4 23-07-2026 At the outset, Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed and, as such, he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.

2. In view, thereof, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

3. Learned Advocate for the respondents are present.

shivank/- (Harish Kumar, J) U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead