Patna High Court
CR. MISC./32714/2026 of Md. Anzar @ Anzar Vs The State of Bihar on 23 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32714 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2025 Thana- TERHAGACHH District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Md. Anzar @ Anzar (M), aged about 28 years, S/o Ibrahim, Resident of village - Dahibhat,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32714 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2025 Thana- TERHAGACHH District- Kishanganj ======================================================
Md. Anzar @ Anzar (M), aged about 28 years, S/o Ibrahim, Resident of village - Dahibhat, P.S. - Tedhagachh, District - Kishanganj
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND
MALVIYA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
23-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 61(1) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, the informant alleged that her husband lay in a pool of blood at Rajbandh and she found that her husband dead at PHC Tedhagachha after being brutally killed and she strongly believes that the owner of mobile number from where her husband received the call has killed her husband out of criminal conspiracy.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to local village politics. He next submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR and only some suspicion raised by the informant against Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32714 of 2026(3) dt.23-07-2026
him and there is no eye witness in the present case and the informant has only suspicion against the petitioner. He next submits that during course of investigation not a single witness has stated before the police that he seen the occurrence or he also seen the deceased with the petitioner at the time of occurrence. Petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para- 3 of the petition and he is in custody since 21.12.2025 and similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33875 of 2026.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. In the light of the aforesaid submissions as made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessins Judge-III, Kishanganj in connection with Sessions Trail No.102 of 2026 arising out of Tedhagachh P.S. Case No. 234 of 2025.
Brajesh Kumar/- (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U T