Patna High Court
CR. MISC./32749/2026 of Akash Maurya Vs The State of Bihar on 23 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32749 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-502 Year-2025 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Akash Maurya, aged about 25 years, Gender-Male, Son of Durg Vijay Verma @ Durgvijay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32749 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-502 Year-2025 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN District- Gopalganj ======================================================
Akash Maurya, aged about 25 years, Gender-Male, Son of Durg Vijay Verma @ Durgvijay Prasad Verma, Resident of Maunath Bhanjan Kanso, Kanso, P.S- Haldharpur, District- Mau,U.P
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Indrajeet Bhushan, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND
MALVIYA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
23-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.
2. The petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the BNS.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, it is a case of missing of the son of the informant by one Anurag Gupta.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to local village politics. He next submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name transpired in the present case due to fact that the SIM Cards issued in the name of petitioner, was used to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32749 of 2026(3) dt.23-07-2026
send some Whatsapp messages to Silipi Gupta(wife of Anurag Gupta) and others, due to this fact, the petitioner has been implicated in the present case. Petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para-3 of the petition and he is in custody since 05.01.2026.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. In the light of the aforesaid submissions as made by learned counsel for the petitioner, it is clear from the petition that the petitioner is implicated in this case only on the basis of his confessional and that does not shows the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged occurrence, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No. 502 of 2025.
Brajesh Kumar/- (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U T