Patna High Court
CWJC/16395/2022 of Techniwas Electronic Vikash Sansthan Vs The State of Bihar on 23 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16395 of 2022 ====================================================== Techniwas Electronic Vikash Sansthan Mahesh Sadan, Mohanpur, Punaichak, Patna, through its Secretary Devendra Kumar, male, aged about 62 years, Son of Late Pasupati
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16395 of 2022
======================================================
Techniwas Electronic Vikash Sansthan Mahesh Sadan, Mohanpur, Punaichak, Patna, through its Secretary Devendra Kumar, male, aged about 62 years, Son of Late Pasupati Singh, Resident of Village- Majlishpur, P.S.- Kopa, District- Saran, Presently residing at Mahesh Sadan, Mohanpur, Punaichak, P.S.- Shastrinagar, District-Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Department at Land and Revenue Department, Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Saran at Chhapar.
3.
The Superintendent of Police Saran at Chhapra.
4.
The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Revilganj, Saran.
5.
The Circle Officer, Revilganj, Saran.
6.
The Station House Officer, Kopa, P.S.- Saran.
7.
Shantanu Singh S/o Late Prabhunath Singh, R/o Mauza- Majlishpur, P.S.
Kopa, Dist- Saran.
8.
Sarita Devi W/o Shantanu Singh, R/o Maiza- Majlishpur, P.S.- Kopa, Dist- Saran.
9.
Mostt. Kismato Kuer W/o Late Achhaibar Singh, R/o Mauza- Majlishpur, P.S.- Kopa, Dist- Saran.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate
Mr. Prabhat Kuar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Raj Kishore Roy (GP-18)
Mr. Vivekanand Prasad, AC to GP-18
For the Resp. No. 8
:
Mr. Parth Gaurav, Advocate
Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Pandey, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
23-07-2026 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also Mr. Parth Gaurav, learned counsel for the respondent no. 8.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or an appropriate writ, order or Patna High Court CWJC No.16395 of 2022(3) dt.23-07-2026
orders, direction or directions commanding the respondents authorities to remove the encroachment over public land appertaining to Tauzi No. 8919 Khata no. 352, S.P. No. 707 having an area of 4 Kattha 11 Dhurs, Situated at Mauza- Tekniwas, Thana No. 273, Circle-Rivilganj, Saran as it is registered in the name of Government for the purpose of the development of the petitioner (Institution), and further the petitioner also prays for other reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled under the law.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the counter-affidavit shows that the proceeding has been initiated by the respondent.
4. In that background, liberty be granted to approach the Court afresh as and when situation so arise.
5. Granting said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U