Patna High Court
CR. APP (DB)/898/2026 of Kush Kalra Vs The Union of India, through National Investigation Agency, Ministry of Home Affairs. on 22 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.898 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2025 Thana- NIA District- Patna ====================================================== Kush Kalra S/o Vijay Kalra R/o 02/10, Green Park,Near Lucky Colony, P.S.- Shahabad Markanda, Kurukshetra,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.898 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2025 Thana- NIA District- Patna
======================================================
Kush Kalra S/o Vijay Kalra R/o 02/10, Green Park,Near Lucky Colony, P.S.- Shahabad Markanda, Kurukshetra, Haryana-136135.
... ... Appellant
Versus
The Union of India, through National Investigation Agency, Ministry of Home Affairs. R/o Ward No. 22-B, Reserve Circle, House No. 251,247-B, Patliputra Colony, Patna, Bihar- 800013.
... ... Respondent
Appearance :
For the Appellant
:
Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Senior Advocate
Mr. Kundan Kumar, Advocate
For the NIA
:
Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Special PP
Mr. Ankit Kumar Singh, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)
22-07-2026 Matter has been listed under heading ‘To Be Mentioned’ on the request of learned Senior Counsel for the appellant.
2. It is stated with reference to the stamp report defects that amongst the 16 defects pointed out by the stamp reporter, Defect No. 8 says that formatting/drafting of the memo of appeal does (not) appear to be as per Patna High Court filing rules. It is submitted that the word ‘not’ seems to be missing after the word ‘does’ and before the word ‘appear’.
3. In such circumstance where the appeal is not as per the format of the High Court Rules, he may be permitted to Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.898 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026
withdraw this appeal with liberty to file a fresh appeal.
4. Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, learned Special PP for the NIA is present. He has no objection to the same.
5. In the circumstances stated above, we permit the appellant to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file a fresh appeal as may be advised to the appellant.
6. This appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
lekhi/- (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U