Patna High Court
CWJC/10254/2026 of Usha Devi Vs The State of Bihar on 21 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10254 of 2026 ====================================================== Usha Devi W/o Raj Ballabh Ray, Resident of Teri Ghat, Khajekalan, Patna City Jhauganj, Ranipur Milki Chak, Patna City, P.S.- Khajekalan, District Patna, Bihar-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10254 of 2026
======================================================
Usha Devi W/o Raj Ballabh Ray, Resident of Teri Ghat, Khajekalan, Patna City Jhauganj, Ranipur Milki Chak, Patna City, P.S.- Khajekalan, District Patna, Bihar- 800008.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate, Patna.
4.
The District Magistrate, Saran.
5.
The Circle Officer, Patna, District- Patna.
6.
The Circle Officer, Sonepur, Vaishali.
7.
The S.D.O., Patna City, District- Patna.
8.
D.C.L.R., Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ajit Kumar Ojha, Advocate
:
Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Standing Counsel (23)
:
Mr. Madhusudan Rai, AC to SC-23
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
21-07-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the office.
2. Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.
3. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: “(i) for issuance of appropriate writ/writs directing the respondent authorities to Patna High Court CWJC No.10254 of 2026(2) dt.21-07-2026
get the property under dispute demarcated, after demarcation and scrutiny of the document/ documents produced by the petitioner and upon the said scrutiny if all the documents are found in order not to disturb the peaceful possession of the petitioner in connection with the land in dispute;
(ii) for a further direction to the respondent authorities not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner till the property in dispute is demarcated and the documents pertaining to title over the land in dispute produced by the petitioner are examined;
(iii) for a direction to the respondent authorities to produce all the records pertaining to the land under dispute so as to facilitate proper adjudication of the case in the fact and circumstances articulated herein after.”
4. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall be submitting a suitable reply to the notice and it is expected that unless the same is taken to its logical conclusion, the respondents shall not Patna High Court CWJC No.10254 of 2026(2) dt.21-07-2026
take any coercive steps.
5. Learned State counsel submits that once notice has been issued and the petitioner will reply to it, the natural process is that the respondents will be taking the matter to its logical conclusion after going through the show cause as also the report so submitted.
6. Accepting the words of learned Law Officer on matter and also expecting the respondents to act strictly in accordance with law, once the notice is suitably replied, granting liberty, if any, the writ petition is disposed of.
vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U