Patna High Court

CR. APP (SJ)/493/2026 of Arjun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 21 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.493 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2025 Thana- SC/ST District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Arjun Kumar Son of Kapildev Singh Resident of Village- Basuchak Sekhauna, PO and PS- Saraiya,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.493 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2025 Thana- SC/ST District- Muzaffarpur ======================================================

Arjun Kumar Son of Kapildev Singh Resident of Village- Basuchak Sekhauna, PO and PS- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur,

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar

2.

Gorakh Ram Son of Lakshman ram Resident Of Village- Pirapur urf Shahabad, Po- Jalalpur, Ps- Lalganj, Dist- Vaishali at hajipur

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Appellant/s

:

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate

For the Respondent/s

:

Ms. Usha Kumari 1, Special PP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

21-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Special P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. In view of the grounds taken in the limitation application, delay of 121 days in filing the appeal is condoned, as such, I.A. No. 01 of 2026 is allowed.

3. This is an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “SC/ST Act”) against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail vide order dated 03.07.2025 in A.B.P. No. 1999 of 2025 passed by the learned Special Judge S.C./S.T. (POA) Act, Muzaffarpur in Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.493 of 2026(3) dt.21-07-2026

connection with Muzaffarpur SC/ST P.S. Case No. 12 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(3), 3(5), 115, 126(2) and 352 of the BNS, 2023 as well as Sections 3(1) (r) and 3(1) (s) of the SC/ST Act.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that accused persons took Rs. 10 Lakhs on pretext of getting government job for his son and gave four joining letters of Forest Guard in Forest Department, Uttarakhand, further appellant issued cheque of Rs. 4,50,000/-, but same on presentation for encashment bounced, next alleges that the accused persons including the appellant called the informant and his son to their house on pretext of returning the money and when informant and his son went to their house they were abused and ousted from the house.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant.

6. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant submits that he has instructions not to oppose the appeal.

7. In view of the submissions made by the learned Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.493 of 2026(3) dt.21-07-2026

counsel for the appellant, the order dated 03.07.2025 in A.B.P. No. 1999 of 2025 is hereby set aside and the appellant above- named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Muzaffarpur SC/ST P.S. Case No. 12 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

8. Accordingly, the appeal stands allowed.

9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead