Patna High Court
CWJC/8388/2025 of Krishna Singh Vs The State Of Bihar on 21 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8388 of 2025 ====================================================== Krishna Singh Son of Late Vikrama Singh, Resident of Village- Ward No. 03, Manalpur Gudriya, Police Station- Nautan, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8388 of 2025
======================================================
Krishna Singh Son of Late Vikrama Singh, Resident of Village- Ward No. 03, Manalpur Gudriya, Police Station- Nautan, District- West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran.
3.
The Sub- Divisional Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran.
4.
The Circle Officer, Nautan, District- West Champaran.
5.
Chandra Shekhar Ojha, Son of Late Hari Shankar Ojha, Resident of Village- Mangalpur Gudriya, Ward No. 4, Police Station- Nautan, District- West Champaran.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ram Kishun Prasad, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Standing Counsel (15)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
21-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: “(i) For direction to Respondent authorities for vacating from illegal possession of private Respondent from the dwelling house of the petitioner.
(ii) For further direction to the Respondents to restrain private Respondent from disturbing the peaceful possession of the petitioner.
(iii) For any other relief/ reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
Patna High Court CWJC No.8388 of 2025(3) dt.21-07-2026
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the respondent no. 3, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran against the disturbances that have been created by the respondent no. 5, Chandra Shekhar Ojha.
4. Learned State counsel submits that if the petition is preferred, it will be taken up and disposed of in accordance with law.
5. In that background, the writ petition stands disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach afresh before the Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran (respondent no.
3) who shall be noticing the parties and shall ensure that the entire process/exercise is completed within a particular time frame in accordance with law.
sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U