Patna High Court
CWJC/10205/2026 of Sabra Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar on 20 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10205 of 2026 ====================================================== Sabra Khatoon Wife of Md. Irshad, resident of village- Tarar, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10205 of 2026
======================================================
Sabra Khatoon Wife of Md. Irshad, resident of village- Tarar, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Aurangabad.
4.
The Superintendent of Police, District- Aurangabad.
5.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad.
6.
The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms (D.C.L.R.), Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad.
7.
The Circle Officer, Anchal- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad.
8.
Md. Dilnaj, Son of Late Suyaib Alam resident of village- Tarar, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad.
9.
Md. Shahanshah Alam, Son of Late Md. Khairat Resident of village- Tarar, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad.
10.
Md. Hasnat @ Pappu Khan, Son of Late Md. Khairat Resident of village- Tarar, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad.
11.
Md. Ahtesham @ Jamjam Khan, Son of Late Md. Khairat Resident of village- Tarar, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Suraj Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr.Rajeshwar Singh, GA-10
Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to GA-10
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
20-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
(i) to issue an appropriate writ preferably in the nature of Mandamus, commanding upon Patna High Court CWJC No.10205 of 2026(2) dt.20-07-2026
the Respondent authorities to remove illegal encroachment over the land of the petitioner appertaining to Khata No. 857, Plot No. 3359, area 05 decimal situated in Mauza- Tarar, block-Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad;
(ii) to issue an appropriate writ preferably in the nature of Mandamus commanding upon the Respondent authorities particularly the Circle Officer, Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad to take appropriate legal step for removal of encroachment over the aforesaid land of petitioner by the Private Respondent (Respondents 2nd set) at the earliest;
(iii) to grant any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner may be found entitled to, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the petition, a petition has been preferred by respondent nos. 09 and 10 before the Divisional Patna High Court CWJC No.10205 of 2026(2) dt.20-07-2026
Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gayaji in BLDR Appeal No. 53 of 2023-27 (Md. Hasmat Alam & Anr. vs. Sabra Khatoon & Ors. in which they have received the notice and intend to respondent to it.
4. In that background, permission is granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to agitate it as and when required.
5. Learned State counsel has no objection.
6. Granting said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of.
Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U