Patna High Court
CWJC/15487/2023 of Om Prakash Arya Vs The State of Bihar on 20 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15487 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.1. Sanjeev Lochan son of Late Om Prakash Arya resident of Chandi Railway Gumti, P.S.- Muffasil (Sadar) and District-Purnea. 1.2. Ragini Nayak daughter of Late Om
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15487 of 2023
======================================================
1.1. Sanjeev Lochan son of Late Om Prakash Arya resident of Chandi Railway Gumti, P.S.- Muffasil (Sadar) and District-Purnea.
1.2. Ragini Nayak daughter of Late Om Prakash Arya resident of Chandi Railway Gumti, P.S.- Muffasil (Sadar) and District-Purnea.
1.3. Saroj Devi Gupta daughter of late Om Prakash Arya resident of Chandi Railway Gumti, P.S.- Muffasil (Sadar) and District-Purnea.
2.
Prabhashkar Lochan, S/o Omprakash Arya R/o Chandi Railway Gumti, P.S.- Muffasil, (Sadar), District- Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Prohibition, Excise and Regulation, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Inspector General of Registration, Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Collector, Purnea.
5.
That Additional Collector, Purnea.
6.
The Circle Officer, Purnea East, Purnea.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. J.S. Arora, Sr. Advocate
Ms. Prakriti Prakash, Advocate
Ms. Supriya Kumari, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Vivek Prasad, GA-7
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
20-07-2026 Heard Mr. J.S. Arora, learned Senior counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Roona for the State.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “i. For commanding the authorities to remove the raiyati land of the petitioners from the Patna High Court CWJC No.15487 of 2023(6) dt.20-07-2026
list under the heading of "transfer prohibited" shown on the portal of the Department of Prohibition, Excise and Registration, entry made on the basis of the telephonic instructions of the learned Collector, without assigning any reason for the same.
ii. Also for commanding the respondent Circle Officer to accept the rent from the petitioner and in lieu thereof rent receipt may be directed to be issued.
iii. Also for any other appropriate relief(s) to which the petitioners are found entitled either in the eye of law or in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
3. After some argument, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that they shall be exploring the legal remedy available under the law of the land including knocking the doors of the competent Civil Court.
4. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to it.
5. In that background, granting said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.
6. Any suit filed by the petitioners, under no Patna High Court CWJC No.15487 of 2023(6) dt.20-07-2026
circumstance, will prejudiced by any order whatsoever passed by any authority.
Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U