Patna High Court
CWJC/10179/2026 of Anirudha Singh Vs The State of Bihar on 20 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10179 of 2026 ====================================================== Anirudha Singh Son of Late Dev Muni Chaudhary, Resident of village- Gogahara, P.O.- Gori, P.S.- Kargahar, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10179 of 2026
======================================================
Anirudha Singh Son of Late Dev Muni Chaudhary, Resident of village- Gogahara, P.O.- Gori, P.S.- Kargahar, District- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.
3.
The Additional District Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas.
4.
The Sub-divisional Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas.
5.
The Deputy Collector of Land Reforms, Sasaram, Rohtas.
6.
The Circle Officer, Kargahar, District- Rohtas.
7.
Sheo Muni Singh, Son of Late Ghurfekan Singh, Resident of village- Gogahara, P.O.- Gori, P.S.- Kargahar, District- Rohtas.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mrs.Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG-12
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
20-07-2026 Heard Mr.Babu Nandan Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
(i) to issue writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions including a writ in the nature of Mandamus direction the Respondents authorities for measurement the Raiyati land of the petitioner having thana no.161, Khata no.8, Khesra no.325 and 326
Patna High Court CWJC No.10179 of 2026(2) dt.20-07-2026
and Rakba 8 decimals under Anchal Kargahar, District-Rohtas, upon which the private respondent no.7 has illegally claimed upon the said land without any locus because the said land is raiyati land of the petitioner and the said land has mutated already, muted in the name of father of the petitioner and the rent receipt has been issued by the State Government of Bihar in the name of the father of the petitioner also;
(ii) for any other relief/reliefs to which the petitioner is found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it will suffice if the Circle Officer, Kargahar, Rohtas (respondent no.06) takes cognizance of the matter and pass necessary order as already an application to this effect has been given.
4. Learned State counsel submits that if a fresh petition alongwith the requisite fee is submitted, appropriate steps shall be taken.
5. In that background, the writ petition is disposed of Patna High Court CWJC No.10179 of 2026(2) dt.20-07-2026
allowing the petitioner to approach he Circle Officer, Kargahar, Rohtas (respondent no.06) with fresh petition in next four weeks who shall be taking the matter to its logical conclusion after hearing all the parties within a period of three months.
Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U