Patna High Court

CWJC/5401/2026 of Ram Beser Singh Vs The State of Bihar on 20 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5401 of 2026 ====================================================== 1. Ram Beser Singh S/o Late Chhandhary Gope, Resident of Village Gauripunda, PS Fathua, District Patna. 2. Ghutani Singh, S/o Lt. Nunu Singh, Resident of Village

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5401 of 2026

======================================================

1.

Ram Beser Singh S/o Late Chhandhary Gope, Resident of Village Gauripunda, PS Fathua, District Patna.

2.

Ghutani Singh, S/o Lt. Nunu Singh, Resident of Village Gauripunda, PS

Fathua, District Patna.

3.

Sarvan Singh, S/o Lt. Dukhi Gope, Resident of Village Gauripunda, PS

Fathua, District Patna.

4.

Mehar Chand Singh, S/o Lt. Bhagwat Singh, Resident of Village Gauripunda, PS Fathua, District Patna.

5.

Aju Singh, S/o Lt. Nunu Singh, Resident of Village Gauripunda, PS Fathua, District Patna.

6.

Rajniti Singh, Son of Late Ram Briksh Singh @ Manjhi Singh, Resident of Village Gauripunda, PS Fathua, District Patna.

7.

Bhushan Singh, Son of Late Ram Briksh Singh @ Manjhi Singh, Resident of Village Gauripunda, PS Fathua, District Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Collector, Patna, District Patna.

5.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, District Patna.

6.

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Patna, District Patna.

7.

The Circle Officer, Fatuha, Patna.

8.

The Block Panchayati Raj Officer, Fatuha, District Patna.

... ... Respondent/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Ms. Pragya Kiran, Advocate

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr.K.P. Gupta, GP-10

Mr. Anwar Karim, AC to GP-10

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

20-07-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) from constructing Restraining the respondents Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan on

Patna High Court CWJC No.5401 of 2026(4) dt.20-07-2026

the raiyati land of the petitioners bearing, Survey Plot No. 610 Under Khata No. 414 area measuring 7 Acre 4 decimals at Mauza Gauri Punda, Thana no. 26, P.S.-Fatuha, District-Patna without following due process of acquisition of said land;

(ii) for quashing of order bearing Memo No. 93 dated 17.03.2026 issued by Block Panchayati Raj Officer, Fatuha to Circle Officer, Block-Fatuha, District-Patna in respect of serial no lauri Pundah Panchayat al Mauza-Gauri Pundah, Thana No. 26, Khata No. 414, Khesra No. 610, area 50 decimals out of 7.04 Acre by which order for demarcation of selected land, for construction of Panchayati Sarkar Bhawanon the Sald plot No 610;

(iii) for stay of impugned action of order dated 28.10.2024 issued by Circle Officer, Fatuha, District-Patna on the basis of wrong report dated 28.10.2024 submitted by Revenue Karamchari and Anchal Amin, Patna High Court CWJC No.5401 of 2026(4) dt.20-07-2026

Fatuha, District-Patna;

(iv) any other relief or reliefs to which the petitioners may be found-entitled by granted to them.

3. A counter affidavit has come on behalf of respondent nos. 4 to 8 and paragraphs 7 and 8 shows that despite the notice to the petitioner, he chose not to appear before the Circle Officer, Fathua. Accordingly, the records have been sent to the office of the Additional Collector, Patna vide letter no. 389 dated 16.02.2026.

4. In view of the development that has taken place, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed to agitate the matter before the Additional Collector, Patna where the files have been sent by the Circle Officer, Fathua.

5. Learned State counsel submits that if the petitioner cooperate, the matter shall be taken to its logical conclusion at an earliest.

6. Recording the submissions of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of expecting the Additional Collector, Patna to dispose of the matter at an earliest. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead