Patna High Court
CWJC/7095/2026 of Vinod Prasad Vs The Chief General Manager-cum-Regional Manager, National High Authority of India on 20 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7095 of 2026 ====================================================== Vinod Prasad Late Baidh Nath Prasad, resident of Village- Raipatti, P.O. and P.S- Dighwara, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Chief General
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7095 of 2026
======================================================
Vinod Prasad Late Baidh Nath Prasad, resident of Village- Raipatti, P.O. and P.S- Dighwara, District- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Chief General Manager-cum-Regional Manager, National High Authority of India Patna.
2.
The Project Director, National Highway Authority, Sherpur, Dighwara Ring Road, Chapra, Saran, Bihar.
3.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt.
of Bihar, Patna 6.
5.
The Director, Land Acquisition, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Bihar, Patna.
6.
The District Magistrate, Saran.
7.
The Competent Officer-cum-District Land Acquisition Officer, Saran.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Dhananjay Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Standing Counsel 01
For the NHAI
:
Dr. Maurya Vijay Chandra, Advocate
Ms. Preety Ranjan, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
20-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: “(i) for issuance of order/s, directions/s, command/s or including writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the concerned respondent authorities to re-determination on award which is provided under Section 28A of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Patna High Court CWJC No.7095 of 2026(3) dt.20-07-2026
Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and enhance the compensation amount as per revised rate as ascertained by the Government.
(ii) for any other relief/s for which the petitioner may found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the present case.
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it will suffice if he is allowed to approach the Collector, Saran, Chhapra (respondent no.6).
4. Learned State counsel has no objection.
5. Granting said liberty and expecting the respondent to act and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law, at an earliest, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U