Patna High Court
CR. APP (SJ)/2549/2022 of PAWAN YADAV Vs The State of Bihar on 20 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2549 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-242 Year-2021 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1. PAWAN YADAV SON OF LATE PRAMOD YADAV R/O VILLAGE- CHADWA DHALA, P.S.- RASULPUR, DISTRICT- SARAN 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2549 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-242 Year-2021 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran
======================================================
1.
PAWAN YADAV SON OF LATE PRAMOD YADAV R/O VILLAGE- CHADWA DHALA, P.S.- RASULPUR, DISTRICT- SARAN
2.
KHUSHBU KUMARI D/O LATE PRAMOD YADAV R/O VILLAGE- CHADWA DHALA, P.S.- RASULPUR, DISTRICT- SARAN
3.
SARITA DEVI D/O LATE PRAMOD YADAV R/O VILLAGE- CHADWA
DHALA, P.S.- RASULPUR, DISTRICT- SARAN
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
PUJA KUMARI D/O SHARMA BANSFORE R/O VILLAGE- CHADWA
DHALA, P.S.- RASULPUR, DISTRICT- SARAN
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s
:
Mr. Vijay Kumar Srivastva
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Binay Krishna
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
20-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State, Mr. Binay Krishna.
2. Learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State, at the outset, submits that the case is of the year 2022 and notices were issued by order dated 23.08.2022 by the then learned Coordinate Bench and interim protection was granted, it is next submitted that thereafter the case was taken up on 29.06.2026 and the appellants were directed to file jointness application since notice was received by Neha Kumari, but it appears that Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2549 of 2022(4) dt.20-07-2026
till date appellants have not filed jointness application which amply demonstrates that appellants after obtaining stay are moving at their leisure.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submits that despite his best endeavour the appellants could not be contacted nor appellants ever in these four years contacted him.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned Special Public Prosecutor, the Court is not inclined to entertain the appeal.
5. Thus, the appeal is rejected.
vikram/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T