Patna High Court

CR. MISC./35183/2026 of Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 17 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35183 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2026 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West Champaran ====================================================== Rohit Kumar S/o Mathura Prasad Resident of Village- Ramgarhwa Bazar, P.S.- Ramgarhwa,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35183 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2026 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West Champaran ======================================================

Rohit Kumar S/o Mathura Prasad Resident of Village- Ramgarhwa Bazar, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, Dist.- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Sitesh Kashyap, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhuri Lata, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

17-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bettiah P.S. Case No. 147 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(2)/317(4)/317(5) B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, during the checking of vehicles, the petitioner was found driving a motorcycle, and it was revealed that the said motorcycle was stolen one.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the petitioner was not aware that the motor cycle in question was a stolen property.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35183 of 2026(4) dt.17-07-2026

It has further been submitted that the search and seizure is in violation of Section 105 of B.N.S.S. It has further been submitted that the case is triable by learned Magistrate, nevertheless, charge sheet has been filed against the petitioner and there is no allegation of tampering against him. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 10.03.2026 and although he is accused in one another case, but not of similar nature.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Heard the parties and perused the record.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances and parity of the case, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah P.S. Case No. 147 of 2026 .

8. The application stands allowed.

Sahil/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead