Patna High Court

CR. MISC./28136/2026 of Tunnu Kumar @ Nandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 17 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28136 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-990 Year-2019 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Tunnu Kumar @ Nandan Kumar S/o Pramod Singh R/o Village - Sahwajpur, P.S - Jehanabad (Kalpa),

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28136 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-990 Year-2019 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ======================================================

Tunnu Kumar @ Nandan Kumar S/o Pramod Singh R/o Village - Sahwajpur, P.S - Jehanabad (Kalpa), District - Jehanabad

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akbar Ali, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

17-07-2026 Heard Mr.Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Jehanabad (Kalpa) P.S. Case No. 990 of 2019 instituted under Sections 147, 148, 149, 380, 302, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act lodged on 28.11.2019 by the informant, Ganesh Yadav.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on 27.11.2019 while he alongwith his mother was sleeping, the accused persons entered which included this petitioner with pistol in his hand and later, the allegation is that they are not vacating the land, Dharmendra Kumar opened fire from the pistol hitting on the cheek while Tunnu fired which hit back of the mother who died on the spot. He anyhow managed to escape Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28136 of 2026(4) dt.17-07-2026

and noticed five motorcycles present at the spot. This led to the FIR.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the investigation, his location of the petitioner has been found to be elsewhere (Rohtas) and not at the place of occurrence and this delayed the investigation.

5. Learned APP on the other opposes the prayer submitting that he is one of the main culprit and has moved this Court after seven years and the case diary shows that the police repeatedly visiting his place but without success.

6. Taking into account the submissions of the parties as also the role that has been assigned to the petitioner, no relief can be extended.

7. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

8. If the petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks from today, the Court concerned shall take up the matter and dispose it of preferably on the same day.

Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead