Patna High Court
CR. MISC./48657/2026 of Rabish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 16 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48657 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2026 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1. Rabish Kumar S/O Upendra Yadav R/O Village- Mandal, P.S.- Okri, Dist.- Jehanabad. 2. Samadhar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48657 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2026 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ======================================================
1.
Rabish Kumar S/O Upendra Yadav R/O Village- Mandal, P.S.- Okri, Dist.- Jehanabad.
2.
Samadhar Kumar @ Samodhar Kumar S/O Bali Ram Yadav R/O Village- Mandal, P.S.- Okri, Dist.- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Bipin Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Madan Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
16-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Excise Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no.1 has antecedent of two cases under the Excise Act and petitioner no.2 has antecedent of one case under the Excise Act and the allegation is of recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a place near bank of Phalgu river.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners were not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48657 of 2026(2) dt.16-07-2026
recovered from their conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place, which does not belong to the petitioners and is accessible to public at large and they came to be implicated at the instance of Chaukidar with whom they are on an inimical term.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on provisional anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/ successor Court in connection with Ghoshi (Okri) P. S. Case No.114 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court after accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioners shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in the event, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48657 of 2026(2) dt.16-07-2026
if it is found that petitioner no.1 has antecedent of more than two cases and petitioner no.2 has antecedent of more than one case, then it would be presumed that petitioners for the purposes of obtaining anticipatory bail had concealed their antecedent before this Court, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found that petitioner no.1 has antecedent of two cases only and petitioner no.2 has antecedent of one case only, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T