Patna High Court
CR. MISC./4723/2023 of SHARDANAND SINGH Vs The State of Bihar on 16 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4723 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2020 Thana- ARWAL MAHILA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1. SHARDANAND SINGH SON OF LATE RAMCHANDRA PRASAD SINGH R/O VILL.- MOKARI, P.S.- ARWAL,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4723 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2020 Thana- ARWAL MAHILA District- Jehanabad
======================================================
1.
SHARDANAND SINGH SON OF LATE RAMCHANDRA PRASAD
SINGH R/O VILL.- MOKARI, P.S.- ARWAL, DISTT.- GAYA
2.
PUSHPENDRA KUMAR SON OF SHARDANAND SINGH R/O VILL.- MOKARI, P.S.- ARWAL, DISTT.- GAYA
3.
JAIMATI DEVI WIFE OF SHARDANAND SINGH R/O VILL.- MOKARI, P.S.- ARWAL, DISTT.- GAYA
4.
VIVEK KUMAR SON OF SHARDANAND SINGH R/O VILL.- MOKARI, P.S.- ARWAL, DISTT.- GAYA
5.
DHARMENDRA PRASAD SINGH @ DHARMENDRA KUMAR SON
OF SHARDANAND SINGH R/O VILL.- MOKARI, P.S.- ARWAL, DISTT.- GAYA
... ... Petitioners.
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
LALAN PRASAD SON OF JAGDISH PRASAD R/O VILL.- KUJAPI, P.S.- CHANDAUTI, DISTT.- GAYA
... ... Opposite Parties.
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
3 16-07-2026 This case has been listed under the heading ‘To Be Mentioned’ at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application submitting that this application has become infructuous on account of the fact that the petitioners have been acquitted by the learned Court below.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. Trivedi/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T