Patna High Court
CR. MISC./47856/2026 of Ramesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 16 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47856 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2026 Thana- KEWATI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Ramesh Kumar Son of Chandeshwar yadav Resident of Village -Chatra Police Station -Keoti District
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47856 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2026 Thana- KEWATI District- Darbhanga ======================================================
Ramesh Kumar Son of Chandeshwar yadav Resident of Village -Chatra Police Station -Keoti District -Darbhanga
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Sangeeta Sharma, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
16-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 458 liters of liquor from two vehicles and from a field.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of any of the seized vehicles nor the field belongs to him and he came to be implicated based on secret information which Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47856 of 2026(2) dt.16-07-2026
is the easiest way to implicate someone without holding a proper investigation, when petitioner admittedly is a person with clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Keoti P.S. Case No. 117 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47856 of 2026(2) dt.16-07-2026
verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T