Patna High Court

CR. APP (SJ)/1766/2025 of Vinod Sah Vs The State of Bihar on 16 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1766 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Khagaria ====================================================== Vinod Sah S/O Ram Charan Sah R/O Village- Mahua Tol (Olapur Gangour), P.S- Gangour, Distt.-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1766 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Khagaria ======================================================

Vinod Sah S/O Ram Charan Sah R/O Village- Mahua Tol (Olapur Gangour), P.S- Gangour, Distt.- Khagaria.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar

2.

Meera Devi W/O Chandra Kishore Rajak R/O Village- Jahangira Sobhni, P.S- Gangour, Distt.- Khagaria.

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Appellant/s

:

Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Advocate

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr.Binay Krishna, Special PP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

16-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special P.P. for the State, Mr. Binay Krishna.

2. This is an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “SC/ST Act”) against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail vide order dated 23.01.2025 in A.B.P. No. 87 of 2024 passed by the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge, 1st cum-Special Judge S.C./S.T. (POA) Act, Khagaria in connection with Mahila (Khagaria) P.S. Case No. 04 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 354, 448 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 3(1)(r)(s)(w) of the SC/ST Act.

3. In view of the grounds taken in the limitation Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1766 of 2025(5) dt.16-07-2026

application delay of five days in filing the appeal is condoned, as such, I.A. No. 01 of 2026 is allowed.

4. At this stage, learned Special PP for the State submits that the case is of the year 2017 and the police after investigation finding the case to be true submitted charge sheet based on which cognizance came to be taken on 24.10.2021, but then it appears that the appellant at his leisure approached learned District Court in the year 2025 seeking anticipatory bail which came to be rejected by an order dated 23.01.2025, it is further submitted that after cognizance much water has flown.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant is not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned Special P.P, as such, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the appellant.

6. This appeal stands rejected.

nitesh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead