Patna High Court

CR. APP (SJ)/519/2026 of Anand Tiwari @ Anand Kumar Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar on 16 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.519 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2025 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Anand Tiwari @ Anand Kumar Tiwari S/o Amarjeet Tiwari Resident of Village - Barisvan, P.S.- Shahpur,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.519 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2025 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur ======================================================

Anand Tiwari @ Anand Kumar Tiwari S/o Amarjeet Tiwari Resident of Village - Barisvan, P.S.- Shahpur, District - Bhojpur

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar

2.

Meena Devi W/o Ramjee Ram Resident of P.O - BarisWan, P.S.- Shahpur, District - Bhojpur

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Appellant/s

:

Mr. Akanksha Malviya

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr. Binay Krishna

Mr. Radhe Shyam Kumar

Mr. Rajesh Kumar

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

16-07-2026

1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and the learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The appellant has challenged the order dated 13.01.2026 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Shahpur P. S. Case No.247 of 2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5) and 103(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va), 3(1)(w) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.519 of 2026(3) dt.16-07-2026

1989, whereby his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail has been rejected.

3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that appellant has antecedent of two cases.

4. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant submits that Ankit Tiwari and another had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No.497 of 2026 and the same came to be rejected by an order dated 16.07.2026 after considering the case in detail and on merits. It is further submitted that case of the appellant is akin to the case of Ankit Tiwari and another.

5. The learned Special P.P. also does not dispute the said submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

6. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant is not in a position to rebut the said submission.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned Special P.P., the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the appellant.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.519 of 2026(3) dt.16-07-2026

8. The prayer of the appellant for anticipatory bail stands rejected.

vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead